Cadernos de Saúde Pública
ISSN 1678-4464
34 nº.9
Rio de Janeiro, Setembro 2018
ARTIGO
Sais de ferro e vitaminas: uso, aquisição e fontes de obtenção para crianças brasileiras
Juliana do Amaral Carneiro Diel, Andréa Dâmaso Bertoldi, Tatiane da Silva Dal Pizzol, Grupo PNAUM
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0102-311X00133317
Pré-Escolar; Sais de Ferro; Vitaminas; Uso de Medicamentos; Fatores Socioeconômicos
Introduction
Anemia and other micronutrient deficiencies in children are a global public health problem. Anemia affects about 300 million children worldwide 1. In 2011, the highest prevalence of anemia was found in children under 5 years of age (42.6%; 95%CI: 33.7-47.4) 1. This condition can result in impairment of the following functions: growth and immunity; mental and psychomotor development, and school and cognitive performance. Diarrhea and respiratory infections, also resulting from anemia, contribute to increasing morbidity, in addition to overloading the health system 2.
In Brazil, the estimated prevalence of anemia in children under 5 years of age is 20.9%, according to the Brazilian National Survey of Demographic and Women and Child Health (PNDS, in Portuguese - 2006 3. However, in a review performed by Vieira et al. 4 with data from studies conducted in different epidemiological scenarios, higher prevalence values were found, ranging from 40.1% to 66.5% for population-based samples in populations in conditions of poverty.
World Health Organization (WHO) recommends the use of multiple micronutrient powders for children aged 6 months to 12 years in populations where anemia is a public health problem 5. In Brazil, the Ministry of Health promotes supplementation programs to reduce the prevalence of anemia and nutritional deficiencies that affect the pediatric population. These programs include: NutriSUS 6, which involves the fortification of infant feeding through the addition of these micronutrients in the powdered form directly in the food available in public schools and day care centers; the Brazilian National Iron Supplementation Program (PNSF, in Portuguese) 7, which provides children aged 6 months up to 24 months with ferrous sulfate, available at health facilities; and the Brazilian National Vitamin A Supplementation Program (PNSVA, in Portuguese) 8, which recommends the administration of megadoses of vitamin A to children aged from 6 months to 59 months, available at health units. According to systematic reviews conducted by The Cochrane Collaboration system, there is evidence in favor of iron salts 9 and vitamin A 10 supplementation.
The Brazilian National Health Survey (PNS, in Portuguese), conducted in 2013, estimated that 57.9% of the Brazilian children between the ages of 6 months and two years have received iron sulfate supplementation at some point in life 11. Studies dealing with this topic are scarce, especially those that have investigated aspects related to the access to these products. According to some studies, the use of vitamins by children between zero and 14 years varies from 4.6% to 12.6%, and the use of iron sulfate from 0.8% to 31% 11,12,13,14,15,16. The most recent population-based studies conducted in Brazil 13,14,16 were geographically limited to a municipality or region of a state, and did not specifically evaluate iron salts and vitamins.
Studies based on data related to prevalence of use, characteristics of users, most used medicines and forms of access to this technology will make it possible to draw a pattern of use and identify problems associated with access and use, contributing to the evaluation of the impact of the Ministry of Health programs.
The aim of this study was to verify the prevalence of use, purchase and sources of iron salts and vitamins by children from zero to 12 years old in Brazil.
Methods
Individuals aged 12 years or under comprised the population study, resident in the urban zone of the five Brazilian regions that participated in the Brazilian National Survey on Access, Utilization, and Promotion of Rational Use of Medicines (PNAUM). PNAUM was a cross-sectional, population-based study with probability sampling, carried out between September 2013 and February 2014 in urban households at national level.
This sample could be considered similar to that of the Brazilian pediatric population when compared with the age and sex data of 2010 Population Census17. The PNAUM sampling plan provided for representativeness for the groups from 0 to 4 and 5 to 19 years without distinction of sex, as described in the methodological article of PNAUM 18. In this manuscript we did not use exactly the same age groups used in the sampling plan, so it was sex (50.9% boys and 49.1% girls), age (< 2 years: 13.9%, 2-5 years: 29,0%, 6-12 years: 57,1%) and region of Brazil (North: 10.9%, Northeast: 30.7%, Southeast: 37.9%, South: 12.9% and Central: 6.7%) 19. Greater details about sample design, data collection logistics and quality control are described in the methodological article of PNAUM 18.
Specific questionnaires were used and answered by the main tutor of the child present in the residence at the time of the interview. At least three visits were made to each address in different shifts. Adults who were judged capable of reporting on the use of medicines and other supplements given to the children living in the household were identified as being the person responsible for them (those who responded on the children's behalf).
Information about the use of vitamins and iron salts was extracted from the question: “In the last 15 days, did (name of the child) use any vitamin, mineral supplement, appetite stimulant or tonic?”. Whenever possible, the packaging or prescriptions of the medications used were presented to the interviewer. Data with reference to the purchase were obtained through the question: “was this medication paid for?”; “yes” answers were computed as payment, here considered direct reimbursement; “no” answers were computed as “free-of-charge medicines”. The places where medications were obtained were extracted from the question “where did you obtain this medication?” and the answers were categorized into: retail pharmacy, Popular Pharmacy, Brazilian Unified National Health System (SUS) and others (charity institutions/church; free samples; friends, relatives and neighbors).
The medicines cited by the interviewees were identified in Anvisa (Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency) lists of medications, and classified by the drugs contained in their composition. The iron-containing medications were classified into: isolated iron sulfate; associated iron sulfate; other forms of isolated iron, and other forms of associated iron. The medications containing vitamins were classified into: ascorbic acid, folic acid, calcitriol, calcium carbonate, polyvitamins and/or minerals, retinol, thiamine, vitamin B, vitamin D and vitamin A and D. The products classified as vitamin supplements were excluded because they were not registered as medications.
The outcomes investigated were: (1) prevalence of the use of iron salts; (2) prevalence of the use of vitamins; (3) forms of purchase of iron salts; (4) forms of purchase of vitamins; (5) sources of iron salts; and (6) sources of vitamins.
The variables analyzed were: sex (male/female), age (under 1 year, from 1 to 2 incomplete years; from 2 to 5 years and from 6 to 12 years); economic classification (A/B, C, D/E), in accordance with Brazilian Association of Research Companies (ABEP) 2013 20; region of Brazil (North, Northeast, Southeast, South, Central) and presence of chronic disease (yes/no).
According to Eisenstein 21, there is no consensus about which age range covers childhood, with the age limit ranging from 10 to 12 years. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in the Guidance for Industry - Clinical Investigation of Medicinal Products in the Pediatric Population22 considers the same age group as that used in this study, which has also been found in previous studies 13,19,23,24,25.
The variable “presence of chronic disease” was used to verify if the use of these drugs could be different among healthier and less healthy children, assuming the presence of at least one chronic disease as an indicator of unhealthy behavior.
Descriptive and bivariate analyses were performed, and the main variables were expressed by relative frequencies and their respective 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). The Pearson chi-square test was used to evaluate the statistical significance of the differences between groups, considering 5% level of significance. All the analyses were performed using the statistical package IBM SPSS 18.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, USA), and the CSPLAN set of commands appropriate for analyzing complex samples and guaranteeing the required ponderation according to the sample design.
The project (PNAUM) was approved by Ethics Research Committee (CONEP, report n. 398.131, on September 16, 2013).The participants were interviewed only after their permission had been obtained with the signature of both participants and researcher of the free and informed consent term.
Results
The sample effectively collected and analyzed was composed of 41,433 individuals, of whom 7,528 were 12 years of age or younger. Of a total of 7,528 respondents, 26 did not know how to answer the main question (“In the last 15 days, did (name of the child) use any vitamin, mineral supplement, appetite stimulant or tonic?”).
Table 1 Characteristics of children participating in PNAUM according to the use of iron salts and vitamins (n = 7,528) PNAUM, Brazil, 2014.
|
The prevalence of the use of iron salts was 1.65% (95%CI: 1.2-2.1). Children under the age of 1 year showed the highest prevalence (8.5%; 95%CI: 6.3-11.5), and the children from 6 to 12 years, the lowest level (0.6%; 95%CI: 0.2-1.4) of use. The highest level of iron salt use occurred in the Southeastern region.
The prevalence of the use of vitamins was 4.8% (95%CI: 4.2-5.6). Children under the age of 1 year were those who made most use of this type of medication (24.3%; 95%CI: 20.3-28.7), and those living in the Northern region, the largest use (8.6%; 95%CI: 6.2-11.7).
Isolated iron sulfate represented over half of the iron salts used (55.4% of all the medications containing iron salts). Of the vitamin medication used, 45.6% were polyvitamins and minerals, 31.5% ascorbic acid, and 16.7% vitamin A and D
Table 2 Iron salts and vitamins used by children participating in PNAUM, Brazil, 2014.
|
The form of obtaining iron containing salts was 41.6% (95%CI: 27.9-56.7) through direct disbursement, and 58.3% (95%CI: 43.1-72.0) was free of charge. When the iron salts were purchased by direct reimbursement, the main source was the retail pharmacy (96.6%; 95%CI: 88.7-99.0) and when they were obtained free of charge the main source was SUS (89.3%; 95%CI: 74.5-96.0). When questioned about from where the iron salts were obtained, SUS was mentioned in just over half of the cases (51.5%; 95%CI: 36.4-66.4)
Figure 1 Forms of purchase and sources of iron salts and vitamins PNAUM, Brazil, 2014.
|
The form of obtaining vitamins was divided into purchase by direct reimbursement (82.4%; 95%CI: 76.3-87.2); free of charge (17.1%; 95%CI: 12.3-23.2) and the source data missing was ignored (0.5%; 95%CI: 0.1-1.9). When the vitamins were purchased by direct reimbursement, the main source was the retail pharmacy (97.5%; 95%CI: 95.0-98.8) and when they were obtained free of charge the main source was SUS (88.9%; 95%CI: 75.5-95.4). When the interviewees were asked from where they obtained the vitamins, the predominant answer was commercial pharmacies (80.6%; 95%CI: 74.4-85.6)
Table 3 Financing by direct reimbursement of iron salts and vitamins, by geographic region and economic classification according to PNAUM, Brazil, 2014.
|
Discussion
The results of this study showed that the use of iron salts by the Brazilian pediatric population was low, and lower than the consumption of vitamins. The use of iron salts was lower in older children. The highest level of iron salt use occurred in the Southeastern region, and of vitamins, in the Northern region. Most iron salts were obtained free of charge, whereas the larger portions of vitamins were purchased by direct reimbursement.
The prevalence of 1.6% of the use of iron salts was similar to the one found in previous studies, such as those by Béria et al. 12 (1.7%), with children up to 4 years of age in Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul State, Brazil; and by Santos et al. 15 (2%), with children from 4 to 11 years old in Salvador, Bahia State Brazil. Nevertheless, other population-based studies conducted in Brazil pointed out higher prevalence values: 11.5% 13, with children under 14 years in the Jequitinhonha Valley, Minas Gerais State, Brazil; 11.1% 16 with children aged 1 to 5 years in Vitória, Espírito Santo State, Brazil; 31.5% in PNDS 2006 26; and 57.9% in PNS 2013 11. Comparison with the results of these studies must consider that the studies with higher prevalence values used considerably longer periods of records (the last 6 months in PNDS 26 and at some point in life in PNS 11 than other studies using the same period of time as PNAUM (15 days prior to the interview) 13,15. Other methodological aspects, such as the format of the question the interviewee was asked (medication-directed or not), in addition to the children's characteristics, such as age and health conditions, may explain the differences in the prevalence values found in the studies 11,13,16,26. In spite of the importance of using iron salts to prevent anemia 9, the consumption may be considered low in all the age ranges analyzed in the PNAUM survey. Even among younger children (< 2 years) the consumption of iron salts was low, due to the recommendation by PNSF of prophylactic use in all children between the ages of six months and two years.
If we compare the prevalence of the use of iron salts in this study with data from health inquiries conducted in Europe, such as those by Du et al. 23, conducted in Germany; and Carrasco et al. 24, in Spain, we would verify similar prevalence values (1.1% and 3.4%, respectively). However, the prevalence values of anemia in these countries were lower than those in Brazil, according to WHO data 1. In the USA, where the prevalence of iron deficiency affected 8 to 14% of the children, according to the Slone Study, the use of iron salts among children from 0 to 11 years in the 7 days prior to the interview was 9.7%, a situation that may be related to the high consumption of vitamin and mineral supplements by American children 25. The fact that those responsible for the children did not recognize iron sulfate as a form of preventing anemia, in addition to the lack of knowledge about the consequences of anemia and difficulties with adhesion, resulting from the adverse effects, may be factors that complicated the use of this medication 16,27,28.
The prevalence of the use of vitamins (4.8%) was close to the values found in other studies, ranging from 4.6% to 11.5% 12,13,15,16,23. The higher prevalence in the use of vitamins in comparison with iron salts may be associated with the sale condition of some vitamins, which do not require prescriptions and are considered safe by the population 29; or because people do not consider vitamins to be medicines and use them to complement a poor diet.
The prevalence values of iron salts and vitamins found were lower in older children. This datum is in agreement with the prevalence of anemia that was shown to be higher in children under the age of 5 years 30 and with the recommendation by PNSF of prophylactic use up to 2 years of age. Particularly between the ages of six months and two years, the need for this mineral increases due to the children's rapid growth 31. Other studies also observed a low prevalence of anemia in older children 26,32,33. The use of iron salts presented a higher prevalence in children from the Southeastern region, and lower prevalence in the population from the Central region, in agreement with the prevalence of anemia in these regions, pointed out by PNDS 2006 (higher prevalence in the Northeastern [25.5%], Southeastern [22.6%] and Southern [21.5%] regions; and lower prevalence in the Northern [10.4%] and Central [11%] regions) 26. PNS 2013 also found higher consumption of iron sulfate by children of 6 months up to 2 years of age 11 in the Southeastern region, in comparison with the other regions. The differences in the prevalence of use of iron salts among regions could also be associated with other factors, such as differences in coverage of health services and in the operationalization of PNSF.
The use of vitamins was greater in the Northern and Northeastern regions and lower in the Southern region. These differences may be explained, at least partially, by the potential use of vitamins in self-medication; and data of PNAUM itself pointed out reasons for the higher prevalence of self-medication in these two regions 34. Furthermore, data from PNDS have shown that the Northern region has the highest rates of weight-age and weight-height deficit for children under the age of 5 years in comparison with the other regions. This may be linked to the high level of use of vitamins by children from the Southern region 3.
Iron sulfate was the iron salt used in little over half of the cases. Iron sulfate is provided free of charge by SUS through PNSF, and, until the end of 2015, it could be acquired by co-payment in the Brazilian Popular Pharmacy services of the network itself, favoring a higher level of its use in comparison with more expensive isolated irons (iron amino acid chelates and ferric polymaltose), according to the Anvisa 35 bulletin. The systematic review conducted by De-Regil et al. 9 found that iron sulfate does not present hematological outcome results different from those presented by the other forms of iron. Moreover, ferrous salts present high frequency of up to 40% adverse effects including: pyrosis, epigastralgia, nausea, vomiting, metallic taste, darkening of the teeth, dyspepsia, abdominal discomfort, diarrhea, and constipation. The symptoms are dose-related and tend to disappear in 2 to 3 days after the onset of treatment. Due to the frequency and intensity of adverse effects of iron salts, they have lower tolerance, worse adhesion to therapy, and thus worse results in comparison with ferric polymaltose 36,37.
Among the vitamins, the polyvitamins, ascorbic acid and vitamin A+D were those most used, in agreement with previous studies 12,13. Data from PNAUM published in 2016 revealed that ascorbic acid was ranked the fifth most used medication among children 19. Ascorbic acid is possibly being used to improve the absorption of iron, or to prevent influenza and colds, although this latter use is not backed by evidence 38.
Direct reimbursement for purchasing of iron salts occurred with higher frequency than was expected, considering that iron sulfate is present in the Brazilian National List of Essential Medicines (RENAME, in Portuguese) and in PNSF. The presence of iron sulfate is consistent with systematic reviews that demonstrate similar efficacy 9 and tolerability 39 to other forms of iron. On the one hand, the option not to use the services offered by SUS, and on the other hand, lack, irregularity and/or unavailability of medication supplies in the public health services, may lead to a significant portion of the population buying the medications with their own resources.
Differently from the iron salts, vitamins were predominantly purchased by direct reimbursement (88.9%) from the retail pharmacy. These findings are in agreement with data from the Brazilian Household Budget Surveys (PNAD, in Portuguese) 2008-2009, which demonstrated that vitamins represented the fifth group of medications on which Brazilian families spent their budget 40. A factor that contributed to the lower access to vitamins obtained free of charge is the reduced number of this class of drugs available in the list of the basic component of pharmaceutical care. On the other hand, many of the vitamins used by children consist of polyvitamins and minerals, some in combinations and amounts that are not justified by evidence, and whose use and availability are not stated in RENAME.
In this study, we did not collect data about diagnosis of anemia and other micronutrient deficiencies in the children, which prevented these conditions from being related to the therapeutic use of iron salts and vitamins. Despite the size and characteristics of the sample (7,528 children aged 0 to 12 residing in municipalities of different sizes from the 5 regions of the country, including all capitals), we cannot affirm that the sample was representative of the entire Brazilian pediatric population due to the following factors: differences in the coverage network, income level and education of parents/tutors, cultural differences and access to medicines, age differences used for this study (0 to 12 years) in relation to the sampling plan for representativeness (0 to 4 years and 5 to 19 years) used in the PNAUM, among other factors. Finally, specific questions about feeding received at day care centers and schools, and about administration of megadoses of vitamin A to children at health services were not included in the questionnaire, to enable the PNSVA and NutriSUS to be assessed to some extent. However, measures of iron salts were adequate to assess the scope of the PNSF in the five regions of the country.
In conclusion, the use of iron salts by the Brazilian pediatric population was low, and lower than the consumption of vitamins, which suggested that the PNSF still needs to attain part of the population that would be within the recommended criteria for use. The use of iron salts and vitamins was lower in older children, in accordance with this stage of development in which the need for iron salts and vitamins is reduced. The higher level of use of iron salts occurred in the Southeastern region. Most iron salts were obtained free of charge, because they were made available by SUS and their use was recommended by PNSF, which should have contributed to a higher consumption than the value found. The majority of vitamins, in turn, were purchased by direct reimbursement. These data should be combined with future qualitative methodologies that involve other aspects of access policies and perception on use of iron salts and vitamins by parents/tutors.
Acknowledgments
The authors thanks Secretariat of Science, Technology and Strategic Inputs oh the Brazilian Ministry of Health (SCTIE/MS) (25000.111834/2) for the financial support.
References
Cadernos de Saúde Pública | Reports in Public Health
Rua Leopoldo Bulhões 1480 - Rio de Janeiro RJ 21041-210 Brasil
Secretaria Editorial +55 21 2598-2511.
cadernos@fiocruz.br